Popnography
CONTACTAbout UsCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2025 Pride Publishing Inc.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
Scroll To Top
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Not that we should be surprised, but the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled that gay judges can impartially judge on matters involving LGBT rights. The obvious factoid only became an issue when supporters of Proposition 8 tried stopping Judge Walker's termination of the bill because he's way gay himself. The proponents somehow thought his judgement would be unethical -- don't worry, the irony doesn't escape us, either.
Lambda's staff attorney Peter Renn had this to say about the decision, which was handed down yesterday: "The court decisively rejected an outrageous attack on the integrity of Judge Walker, not to mention judges in general. The motion was a sideshow designed to deflect attention from the fact that the proponents had every chance to prove that Prop 8 was constitutional, but could not do so. Prop 8 was declared unconstitutional because it is unconstitutional -- not because the judge is gay."
-- FLASH STEINBEISER
Previously > Transphobia Rears Its Ugly Head In The Hangover: Part II
Photo: Getty Images
Watch Now: Pride Today
Latest Stories
Why is Tim Gunn not on 'Project Runway' season 21? Here's what we know
June 12 2025 10:56 AM
Meet the 'Project Runway' season 21 designers and judges
June 12 2025 9:34 AM
Hollywood needs more queer Muslim stories—here are 5 to consider
June 12 2025 8:30 AM
How Arnold helped FUBAR's Fortune Feimster become an action star
June 12 2025 7:30 AM
Former activist finds luxury liberation
June 12 2025 6:00 AM
11 popular Bible passages translated into Polari—a secret gay language
June 11 2025 5:33 PM
These celebrities are reacting to the anti-ICE L.A. protests
June 11 2025 5:24 PM