News & Opinion
CONTACTStaffCAREER OPPORTUNITIESADVERTISE WITH USPRIVACY POLICYPRIVACY PREFERENCESTERMS OF USELEGAL NOTICE
© 2024 Pride Publishing Inc.
All Rights reserved
All Rights reserved
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Private Policy and Terms of Use.
The Smithsonian isn't on my shit list.
The museum, funded by Congress, has mounted a brave and beautiful show on sexual identity. Hide/Seek, in the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery through February 13, is eye-opening in all the ways a museum show should be: It is full of both gorgeous images and bold ideas. I didn't know, for example, that one of the most important early abstract paintings, by Marsden Hartley, was abstract precisely because Hartley needed to disguise its subject matter: his adoration of a man named Karl von Freyburg. And despite the fact that I have written for Out about Jasper Johns and Robert Rauschenberg, I had no idea of the extent to which coded messages to and about each other informed their early, seminal paintings.
The show makes a strong case that queerness has been a powerful influence on American art. It would be a shame if all that were to be forgotten in the uproar about censorship.
Yes, the Smithsonian made a big mistake by pulling a video by David Wojnarowicz. I have nothing but contempt for the officials responsible for that decision.
But, in the resulting controversy, too much has been overlooked.
1) The 'censored' video is all over the Internet. Yes, it shouldn't have been removed from the show, but no one has been deprived of the chance to see Wojnarowicz's work. (Check it out, for example, at the Washington Post website.)
2) The Smithsonian had the guts to mount the show after dozens of other major museums refused. The curator, Jonathan Katz, first proposed Hide/Seek in 1989. It took 15 years to find a home for it. As he points out, some of the same museums now clucking about the Smithsonian philistines were scared off by the subject matter. And some of them wouldn't even lend pieces to the Smithsonian show, according to Katz (who, so far, refuses to name names).
3) The show contains many images pertaining to sex and sexual desire. Critics of the Wojnarowicz video cited an image -- ants crawling on a crucifix -- that they consider sacrilegious. That doesn't make the Smithsonian's decision to remove the video right -- but it does complicate the "homophobia" narrative. (So does the fact that other Wojnarowicz pieces remain in the show.)
4) The museum depends on Congress for its support. (Yes, the show had some private funding, but that doesn't change the basic equation.)
It would have been nice if the Smithsonian had stood up to the pressure from its funder. But that may be expecting the impossible. Organizations with far less to lose have responded far less courageously to congressional bullying. (Think Amazon, which appears to have pulled the plug on WikiLeaks in reaction to a single statement by Sen. Joe Lieberman.)
I'm not alone in thinking the Smithsonian is getting a bum rap. During a talk at the Portrait Gallery on Saturday, Patti Smith took the same view, noting that, if the Smithsonian had lost its funding, 'hundreds of people would be out of work.'
It's not that Smith agrees with the officials who removed the Wojnarowicz video. As she put it pithily: "I imagine Jesus coming back and embracing the ants and being appalled by the crucifix."
But Smith, whose best friend, Robert Mapplethorpe, is represented in the show, said, she was "moved to tears" by what she saw and was afraid that Hide/Seek would be overshadowed by the 'snafu.' The Smithsonian, she said, "has done a wonderful job."
If you don't believe me, listen to Patti Smith. And if you don't believe Patti Smith, see for yourself. The show remains on view -- with one notable omission -- until Valentine's Day eve.
Want more breaking equality news & trending entertainment stories?
Check out our NEW 24/7 streaming service: the Advocate Channel!
Download the Advocate Channel App for your mobile phone and your favorite streaming device!
From our Sponsors
Most Popular
38 Male Celebs Who Did Full Frontal Scenes
November 17 2023 5:18 PM
These are all the celebrities Who came out as LGBTQ+ in 2023
December 31 2023 12:19 PM
26 actors who showed bare ass in movies & TV shows
February 28 2024 1:50 PM
16 times male celebrities had to say they weren't gay
April 17 2024 11:57 AM
21 LGBTQ+ reality dating shows & where to watch them
April 03 2024 4:01 PM
15 Unforgettable Gay Kissing Scenes From TV & Movies
February 14 2024 10:20 AM
14 queens who quit or retired from drag after 'RuPaul's Drag Race'
April 04 2024 12:56 PM
40 steamy celebrity Calvin Klein ads we'll always be thirsty for
January 04 2024 10:54 AM
The 15 Best LGBTQ+ Movies of 2023
December 04 2023 10:32 AM
Watch Now: Advocate Channel
Trending Stories & News
For more news and videos on advocatechannel.com, click here.
Trending Stories & News
For more news and videos on advocatechannel.com, click here.
Latest Stories
How Todrick Hall is giving back to the community
April 17 2024 8:35 PM
Here's who 'Drag Race' fans on social media want to see win season 16
April 17 2024 5:05 PM
Andy Cohen responds to all the recent Bravo & 'Housewives' chaos as more ensues
April 17 2024 3:56 PM
Not just JoJo Siwa: 30 songs made for an artist & released by another
April 17 2024 3:16 PM
How The Pride Store celebrates National Tea Day: A tale of two brews
April 17 2024 2:14 PM
Here's why Netflix's 'Baby Reindeer' is our new twisted queer obsession
April 17 2024 12:17 PM
April 17, 2024
April 17 2024 11:50 AM
Troye Sivan & Charli XCX are teaming up for the gayest tour ever
April 17 2024 11:43 AM
Kennedy Davenport finally explains the rumored 'All Stars 3' drama with Trixie Mattel
April 16 2024 4:16 PM
Watch the queens from 'Drag Race Live' hilariously reveal Out's RuPaul cover
April 16 2024 4:10 PM
Noah Beck claps back at people who assumed he's gay for hugging a male friend
April 16 2024 4:03 PM